Legal Opinion · Dissent

RR Maloan Investments, Inc. v. New HGE, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 27, 2014No. 14-13-00080-CVPublished

1DissentTracy Christopher, Justice

While I agree with the majority that a postdated check is a negotiable instrument, I would affirm the judgment and the trial judge’s implied finding that RR Ma-loan did not act in good faith either in cashing the check before its due date or in cashing the check without making any efforts to verify the check’s validity.

RR Maloan seeks recovery as a holder in due course. The holder of a negotiable instrument is a holder in due course if the holder takes the instrument (1) for value, (2) in good faith, and (3) without notice of any claim or defense to the instrument. Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Point Lookout West, Inc. v. WhortonTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Southwest Bank v. Information Support Concepts, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Williamson Pointe Venture v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. Public Utility Commission v. Cities of Harlingen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  5. Maine Family Federal Credit Union v. Sun Life Assurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API