Legal Opinion

Spillman v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1992No. 3-91-041-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDD, Justice.

This case presents a difficult search and seizure question. Appellant, Michael Maurice Spillman, was indicted for aggravated possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112 (Pamph.1992). Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and pleaded not guilty before the district court. The court found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment and a $20,000 fine.

By agreement of the parties, appellant’s motion to suppress evidence was tried at the same time as the nonjury trial. In a single point of error, appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  2. Woods v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  3. Samaniego v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Winn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API