Legal Opinion

Hartzell v. McGrath

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County

Decided November 3, 1902No. 68Published

Jurisdiction — Trespass—Distinction Between Trespass and Assumpsit — Record of Justice. Certiorari. No. 68, September Term, 1902, C. P. Northampton County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Scott, J.,

OPINION:

The summons from the Magistrate called upon the defendant to answer a “plea of debt.” An affidavit of claim was filed under the Act of 1879, which contained three items, two of which were for separate demands under contract; the third was as follows, viz: “for repairing driveway through plaintiff’s land, which the said defendant, in the construction of a trolley road from Nazareth to Bangor, took possession of and injured, $20.” The defendant did not reply, nor appear at the return-day. Judgment was not entered for this default, but testimony was taken for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gingrich v. SheafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Weisman v. Weisman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API