Legal Opinion · Dissent

Asarco, Inc. v. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 8, 1988No. 9375-8-IIPublished

1DissentWorswick, J.

(dissenting) — Air pollution is bad, but worse is a bureaucracy set up to deal with the subject that does not know how and refuses to learn. Twice this court has spelled out what Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency must include in a valid regulation. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp., 25 Wn. App. 273, 607 P.2d 870, review denied, 93 Wn.2d 1023 (1980), (Kaiser I); Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd., 33 Wn. App. 352, 654 P.2d 723 (1982) (Kaiser II). Apparently learning nothing from this, PSAPCA has again attempted to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Tommy P. v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API