State Ex Rel. Pollock v. Equitable Life Assurance of the United States
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
This is a mandamus proceeding in which relator, the owner of a policy on his life, with the right to change the beneficiary, seeks to compel respondent insurance company to make such change, without delivery of the policy for indorsement thereon of the name of the new beneficiary by the company.
Respondent excepted in the lower court to relator’s petition, on the ground that it failed to disclose a right or cause of action. Prom a judgment maintaining this exception and dismissing the suit, relator has appealed.
The facts of the case, as disclosed by the allegations in the petition, are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Smit v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Lowentritt v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Schmidt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Brown v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Giuffria v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Sbisa v. LazarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Smith v. American National Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- State ex rel. Thalheim v. Louisiana Gas Service Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.