Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1924No. 8426PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, P. J.

Receiving stolen property is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The subject of the theft was a part of a sulky plow, the parts omitted being a mold board and thribble tree. At the time the plow was taken it had been used.

It is the theory of the state that Barney Smith, a brother of the appellant, had stolen the plow, and that the appellant, knowing it to be stolen, received and concealed it.

According, to the appellant’s theory, as de-' veloped from his testimony, when he became aware that his brother had stolen the plow and brought it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Keipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Modica v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API