Legal Opinion

Resource Holding Corp. v. Goldstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 26, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtJames O’Malley, J.

The first action was commenced on September 16, 1925. It was based on a four months’ note for $1,900, dated May 8, 1925, due on September 8, 1925, made by the defendants Goldstein and Lifton, and indorsed by the defendant Chaskin. The plaintiff sued as assignee, alleging that no part thereof had been paid except the sum of $138.

The answer denied non-payment and, evidently by way of defense, alleged that prior to the dates in question the defendants, who were officers of a concern in financial difficulties, in order to effect a composition, had given their note to the plaintiff’s assignor, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Monongahela Valley v. . WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Matter of Utica Nat. Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Fuller Buggy Co. v. WaldronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Fuller Buggy Company v. . WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Bloom v. PolacsekAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API