Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Vukman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceJustice Saylor
I find it unnecessary to reach the issue of whether inadequate notice deprives the courts of subject matter jurisdiction, as, in my view, the notice that Beneficial provided to Appellee was not deficient in the first instance. Accordingly, I concur in the result reached by the Majority.
By way of background, the General Assembly amended the Housing Finance Agency Law via Act 91 of 1988, creating the Homeowner’s Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program (“HEMAP”) and establishing the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency (“PHFA”) as the entity responsible for carrying out HEMAP.1 See *554Act of December…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Nomination of PaulmierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Delaware County v. First Union Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. VukmamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Anela v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Schuylkill Township v. Pennsylvania Builders Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010