Legal Opinion

Protective National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. Roberts

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 21, 1973No. 73-228PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a declaratory judgment determining that uninsured motorist benefits are excess over any collectible no-fault benefits and, therefore, the no-fault carrier has no right of indemnification or equitable distribution because of an uninsured motorist settlement made by it.

The plaintiff filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment against the defendant-insurer. The complaint alleged that the defendant issued a policy of automobile insurance to the plaintiff on May 16, 1971, providing uninsured motorist coverage [UM] and no-fault personal injury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Accident Insurance Company v. GavinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Tuggle v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
  3. Phoenix Insurance Company v. KincaidDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. CarricoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Service Mutual Insurance Co. v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Apodaca v. Old Security InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API