Protective National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. Roberts
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Chief Judge.
Appellant seeks review of a declaratory judgment determining that uninsured motorist benefits are excess over any collectible no-fault benefits and, therefore, the no-fault carrier has no right of indemnification or equitable distribution because of an uninsured motorist settlement made by it.
The plaintiff filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment against the defendant-insurer. The complaint alleged that the defendant issued a policy of automobile insurance to the plaintiff on May 16, 1971, providing uninsured motorist coverage [UM] and no-fault personal injury…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Accident Insurance Company v. GavinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Tuggle v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Phoenix Insurance Company v. KincaidDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. CarricoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Service Mutual Insurance Co. v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Apodaca v. Old Security InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980