Legal Opinion

Sieger v. Prehay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated November 17, 2003, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Joan Prehay and Southpoint, Inc., which were to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the letter dated July 1, 2002, which the plaintiff and the defendant Joan Prehay signed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. SwensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Hackal v. AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. J & J Builders & Developers, Inc. v. John D'Alesio & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pozo v. Impressive Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Makin v. VanTreeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Pozo v. Impressive Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API