Legal Opinion
Conzo v. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 19, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The defendant moves for an order granting defendant summary judgment dismissing the above action on the grounds that plaintiff has no right of action against the defendant, as a matter of law.
The plaintiff’s deposition has been taken by the defendant. It appears therefrom that on November 5, 1947 plaintiff was working as a longshoreman for the defendant and was a hatch boss at Hatch No. 3 of the S.S. Mormacsaga supervising the discharge of a cargo of coffee from the lower hold. He claims that the ship’s winch handling the drafts of coffee was giving trouble the day of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Smith v. The Mormacdale. Gaul v. The Robert LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Samuels v. Munson S. S. Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bernard Harney v. William M. Moore Building Corporation and Lopier Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Bennett v. the MormactealDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
- Claude L. Kyles v. James W. Elwell & Co., a Corporation, G. Heyn & Sons, and Interstatecontracting Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Larsen v. THE M/V TEALDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1961
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Cabot Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.