Legal Opinion
Stringfellow v. Monsanto Company
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided December 29, 1970No. ED 69-C-48PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
OREN HARRIS, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs bring this action against the defendant, Monsanto Company (hereinafter referred to as Monsanto), under the provisions of the newly enacted Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Pub.L. 90-202, Dec. 15, 1967; 81 Stat. 602; 29 U.S.C.A. § 621 et seq. No other case brought pursuant to this Act has been cited and the Court does not know of any proceedings heretofore involving the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
Each of the plaintiffs is an employee within the meaning of Section 11(f) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Ace Hardware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Monroe v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- 14 Fair empl.prac.cas. 518, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,466, 1 Employee Benefits Ca 1537 Gladys E. Rogers and Margaret A. Rogers, as Co-Executrices of the Estate of Dilworth T. Rogers, in No. 76-1115, Cross-Appellants in No. 76-1114 v. Exxon Research and Engineering Company, a Delaware Corporation, in No. 76-1115, Cross-Appellee in No. 76-1114Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- National Cash Register v. RinerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.