Legal Opinion
Morris v. Investment Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1971No. 69-754PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellants contend that the contract of January 9, 1963, was void ah initio because the parties failed to obtain the prior approval of the merger commission provided for in R, C. 3907.11,
*30R. C. 3907.10 provides, in pertinent part:
“* * * When any domestic stock company referred to in Section 3907.09 of the Revised Code proposes to merge or consolidate with any other company, it shall present its petition to the Superintendent of Insurance, setting forth the terms of the proposed merger or consolidation and praying for its approval. The superintendent thereupon shall issue an order of notice…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farris v. Glen Alden Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Rath v. Rath Packing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Ahles Realty Corp. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ramlall v. Mobilepro Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Acordia of Ohio, L.L.C. v. FishelOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- The Rev. Andrew P. Jacobs v. Kenneth Deshetler, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Citibank v. HyslopOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- ASA Architects, Inc. v. SchlegelOhio Supreme Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.