Legal Opinion

Gold v. Gold

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 16, 1909No. 615PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shepard

This is an interference proceeding involving priority of invention of a steam heating system, in an issue of twelve counts as follows:

“1. In combination, an admission pipe carrying a supply of steam at pressure greater than atmospheric, and a steam heating system taking steam from said admission pipe and circuiting it, and including thermostatically controlled 'means for determining whether it shall be circulated at admission pipe pressure or at approximately atmospheric or lower pressure, and for automatically maintaining it at such determined pressure.

A steam heating system including in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gyro Process Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API