Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 12, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBROS, District Judge.
The Government has moved for a court order compelling Samuel Moore and Company (“Samuel Moore”) to com ply with a subpoena duces tecum, and, in particular, to produce for the grand jury twelve appointment calendars used and maintained by executives of Samuel Moore.
In opposition to the Government’s motion, Samuel Moore makes two arguments. First, Samuel Moore asserts that the appointment calendars are personal rather than corporate documents and that, therefore, the individual officers have a right to protect disclosure by asserting the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America, in Re Grand Jury Proceedings Hector G. Rodriguez MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Robert MacKeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981