Legal Opinion

Sobel v. Steelcraft Piston Ring Sales, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1940No. Docket Nos. 35, 36, Calendar Nos. 40,937, 40,938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

This is an appeal on one record from a judgment rendered in a suit in assumpsit on a promissory note instituted by Helen Jaffe against Steelcraft Piston Ring Sales, Inc., M. H. Sobel and'E. J. Brock, and from a decree rendered on a bill in chancery for the reformation of a contract and for other relief by Sobel and Brock against Steelcraft Piston Ring Sales, Inc., and J ames J. Carroll. Because the suits arise out of the same transactions and subjects of action, it was stipulated that the findings of fact in the chancery suit shall be determinative of the assumpsit action. A judgment of no.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Cities Service Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Degood v. GillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Schuler v. BucussMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Lahey v. Hackley Union National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Torrent v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Royal Property Group, LLC v. Prime Insurance Syndicate, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Emery v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Stevenson v. AaltoMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Holda v. GlickMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API