Brown v. City of Bloomington
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentWorke, Judge
I concur with the majority on all issues presented, with the exception of the con-elusion that denies Officer Duerksen and the City of Bloomington official immunity from suit. On that issue, I respectfully dissent.
The majority’s analysis focuses solely on the act of loading a shotgun. This narrow focus fails to consider the nature of the act leading up to and resulting in deployment of less-lethal and lethal rounds, i.e., Duerk-sen’s exercise of judgment in deciding whether to use force, and the degree of that force. In my opinion, his acts are discretionary and immune from suit.
In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Leonzal v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994