Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. City of Bloomington

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 2005No. A04-2221Published

1DissentWorke, Judge

I concur with the majority on all issues presented, with the exception of the con-elusion that denies Officer Duerksen and the City of Bloomington official immunity from suit. On that issue, I respectfully dissent.

The majority’s analysis focuses solely on the act of loading a shotgun. This narrow focus fails to consider the nature of the act leading up to and resulting in deployment of less-lethal and lethal rounds, i.e., Duerk-sen’s exercise of judgment in deciding whether to use force, and the degree of that force. In my opinion, his acts are discretionary and immune from suit.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Leonzal v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API