Legal Opinion
Teten v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided May 13, 2002No. 98-1244PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
Before the Court is the appellant’s November 9, 2000, application, through counsel, for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA). The Secretary filed a response, and the appellant filed a reply thereto. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant in part the appellant’s application.
I. Background
The appellant, the widow of a veteran, through counsel, previously sought review of a May 1998 Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision that dismissed for lack of legal merit a claim for Department of Veterans…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Balridge - Demel v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Scarborough v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Robert J. McDonald v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Daniel E. Abbey v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
- Majeed v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.