Legal Opinion

Vale v. Stubblefield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1913No. 2937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Murray County; R. McMillan, J%idge. Action by R. W. Stubblefield against J. M. Vale. A demurrer to the answer was sustained, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This is a suit in replevin for 75 steers. The court sustained a demurrer to the answer, and the correctness of this ruling is the only question before us.

A brief statement of the facts follows: . Stubblefield, the defendant in error, brought the suit as plaintiff, against Vale, as defendant, in the court below; we will refer to them here as they appeared below. One Graham was the owner of a large herd of cattle on and prior to May 22, 1909, and gave a mortgage on that date to Park National Bank of Sulphur, Okla., for $1,000 on the cattle in controversy. This mortgage was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butt v. EllettSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Madden v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Booth v. First State Bank of MaramecSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Hugo State Bank v. Hugo Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Johnson v. National Sugar Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  4. Central Finance Corp. v. Norton-Morgan Commercial Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API