Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. City Council of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1926No. 25,105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Mandamus to compel tbe city council to investigate and act under G. S. 1923, §§ 4368, 4369, known as tbe Soldiers Preference Law.

An applicant wbo comes witbin tbe statute is entitled to tbe use of tbe writ of mandamus for tbe purposes sought. State ex rel. v. Empie, 164 Minn. 14, 204 N. W. 572.

Tbe city clerk is an officer under tbe language of tbe city charter, e. 3, § 3. He is elected by ballot requiring tbe affirmative vote of a majority of all members of tbe council. Chapter 2, § 2. He may appoint an assistant city clerk. Chapter 3, § 4. Tbe charter de fines the clerk’s duties. He is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fonda v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. People Ex Rel. Jacobus v. . Van WyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. Meehan v. EmpieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Matter of Christey v. . CochraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Sprague v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Caffrey v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Michie v. WalleenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Tusant v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API