Legal Opinion

Hood v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1929No. 6919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

The Court of Appeals certified the following question for decision: “Under section 4424 of the Civil Code of 1910, as amended by the act of 1924 (G-a. L. 1924, p. 60), can adult children maintain an action for the homicide of their mother, where it appears that the husband and father survived the mother, but died before the institution of any suit on account of the homicide?”

*159In Atlanta & West Point Railroad Co. v. Venable, 65 Ga. 55, it was held: “Section 2971 of the Code [of 1873] provides as follows: ‘A widow, or if no widow a child or children, may recover for the homicide of the husband…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mott v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. VenableSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Peeler v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Thompson v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. City of Elberton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harrell v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Happy Valley Farms Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Watson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. McDaniel v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  5. Pollard v. GormanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API