Legal Opinion

Beauchamp v. Fitzpatrick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for partition. Before Judge Mitchell. Brooks superior court. November term, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the head-notes. It was contended that the deed conveyed a fee-simple title to the daughter of the grantor. That such was not the case if there were' children in esse when the conveyance was made is clearly shown by the decision in Plant v. Plant, 122 Ga. 763 (50 S. E. 961), and the cases there cited. If there were no children then in esse, the words, “children of her body” by her husband named, would be treated as words of limitation and fall within the rule in Ewing v. Shropshire, 80 Ga. 376 (7 S. E. 554). The petition failed to allege facts necessary to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ewing v. ShropshireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Plant v. PlantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Singer v. First National Bank Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Lane v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Butt v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Bank of Graymont v. KingerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Medlock v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API