Legal Opinion

Hartwigsen v. Ditto

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1958No. Civ. 5586PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs in an action for damages, fraud and deceit. In September, 1951, the defendants, who owned a chicken ranch in Orange County, listed the property for sale and Paul Kelby, a real estate salesman, was employed by them to assist in conducting and negotiating a sale of the property. Defendants had been operating the ranch without a use variance permit from the Board of Supervisors of Orange County and Kelby informed defendant Clarence Ditto that he should have such a permit in order to consummate a sale of the premises. In October, 1951, Ditto called…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gonsalves v. HodgsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Miller v. BusbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clar v. Board of Trade of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Buist v. C. Dudley DeVelbiss Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Buist v. C. Dudley DeVelbiss Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API