Legal Opinion

Iles v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 2006No. A06A0015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

A jury found William lies guilty of aggravated child molestation, lies moved for a new trial, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, and argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied the motion, and lies appeals. Finding no errors, we affirm.

1. In resolving lies’ challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Construed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Zepp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Sellers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API