Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1929No. 19325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Although a case in this court is one in which it is not sought to review a judgment upon a motion for a new trial, yet what purports to be a brief of the evidence must be such a brief as is required by the Civil Code (1910), § 6093, in motions for a new trial. Civil Code (1910), § 6140 (1); Ryan v. Kingsbery, 88 Ga. 361 (14 S. E. 596); Cooper v. Whaley, 90 Ga. 285 (15 S. E. 824); Batchelor v. Batchelor, 97 Ga. 425 (24 S. E. 157).

2. It appearing in this case, which comes to this court upon a direct bill of exceptions to the award of a nonsuit, that no bona fide effort has been made to brief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ryan v. KingsberySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Roberts v. RowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Jackson v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. O'Farrell v. TemplemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Cooper v. WhaleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API