Thurman v. Rodman

*181Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

Appellant was employed by written contract to sell life insurance policies for appellees, the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, and C. D. Rodman, its general agent. By this action on the contract, he seeks to recover commissions on renewal premiums accruing after his termination of the contract, contrary to an express provision thereof.

His argument to sustain this rather anomalous position is both intricate and futile. In substance it is, that the first part of the contract for specified services vests in him an absolute title or right in…