Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Estes v. Titus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2008No. Docket 133098Published

1ConcurrenceKelly, J.

I write separately to address the concern expressed during this appeal that our decision will leave a great many divorce judgments subject to attack by creditors, thus robbing them of *594finality. I believe the concern is unfounded. As I will explain, relatively few creditors will be incentivized to bring actions under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA) against newly divorced individuals as a result of the Court’s opinion in this case. This is because of the difficulty creditors will encounter in surviving a motion for summary disposition.

Difficulties for creditors will exist on several…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Grochocinski v. Knippen (In Re Knippen)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  4. Dobin v. Hill (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  5. Szkrybalo v. SzkrybaloMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API