Centanni v. Spizer
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
hARMSTRONG, Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff in an automobile personal injury case. The plaintiff alleges that his pre-existing neck condition was aggravated by a minor rear-end collision. The bulk of the evidence consisted of testimony of various doctors. The jury, evidently concluding that the plaintiff had not proven such aggravation, found that the collision was not a proximate cause of any injuries of the plaintiff. The plaintiff argues on appeal that the jury was clearly wrong/manifestly erroneous as to the causation issue. The plaintiff also argues that the trial court erred by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Housley v. CeriseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.