Legal Opinion

McKeon v. McDermott

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The defendant by his answer set up several defenses. 1st. That the note was given for an illegal consideration. 2d. That an attachment for $>2,800 was issued in a suit in favor of one Irvine against the plaintiff, under which he, the defendant, had been garnisheed; and also, 3d. Setting up various payments and matters of set-off. The plaintiff demurred to the several defenses in the answer, and the Court sustained the demurrer as to the defenses of illegality of the consideration and the service of garnishment upon the defendant. The issues were tried…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McFadden v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnsdall v. WaltemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Virginia Fire & Marine Ins. v. New York Carousal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  3. Lynch v. Hartford Fire Ins.United States Circuit Court · 1883
  4. Glugermovich v. ZicovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Lerno v. ObergfellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API