Legal Opinion

Weed v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 15, 1958No. 241-53PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWhxtakee, Judge

Plaintiff sues for his per diem allowance, called a “station allowance”, in lieu of actual expenses for quarters, subsistence and incidental expenses, allowed officers of the Coast Guard stationed in Alaska.

The parties agree there were no messing facilities at plaintiff’s station. This fact, alone, might be considered sufficient to entitle plaintiff to the allowance, but the parties in their arguments assume that the determination of the controversy-turns on whether or not plaintiff occupied Government quarters. The regulations provide that the station allowance is payable “only where…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. True v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lischak v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API