Legal Opinion

Van Inwagen v. Sanstead

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1989No. Civ. 880318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Joseph and Renee Van Inwagen appealed to the district court from a decision of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Wayne Sanstead, denying the Van Inwag-ens’ request that their children be exempted from compulsory school attendance. The district court, concluding that there was no statutory authority for the appeal, dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.

The Van Inwagens initially requested the chairman of the Hazen School Board to exempt their children from compulsory school attendance under Section 15-34.1-03(4), N.D.C.C.:

“15-34.1-03.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kessler v. Board of Education of City of FessendenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Investment Rarities, Inc. v. Bottineau County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Zenith School District No. 32 v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wieland v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Van Inwagen v. SansteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API