Legal Opinion

Charleston National Bank v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 30, 1953No. Docket No. 33231PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

LeMire, Judge:

The first question presented is whether in the taxable years 1944 and 1945 petitioner is entitled to deduct premiums paid on certain policies of life insurance assigned to it as collateral security as ordinary and necessary business expenses under section 23 (a) (1) (A) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Petitioner contends that, since the insurance premiums were paid to protect its security in the hope of ultimately recovering as much of the indebtedness as possible, the expenditures are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under the rationale of Dominion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gus Blass Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  2. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blaess v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  2. Blaess v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API