Kummerle v. Cain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The instrument on which the judgment was entered in this case was in legal effect a power to the Prothonotary to confess judgment, with the same effect as if it had been done by a warrant of attorney: Ely v. Karmany, 23 Pa. 314. The maker of the paper died some months before the judgment was entered. No action had been instituted in her lifetime to enforce the obligation. The instrument therefore lacked the attendant conditions necessary to create a cognovit actionem. The authorities in this State are to the effect that a judgment entered by confession on the authority…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stevenson v. VirtueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Lanning v. PawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Ely v. KarmanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
- Lowber & Wilmer's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
- Kountz v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
3Cited by10 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Mancine v. Concord-Liberty Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- The Kingston Nat. Bk. v. Walters Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Fidelity Bank v. GorsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Brennan v. EnnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.