Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Victor Ginsberg

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 14, 2003No. 99-10983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam 1

This appeal involves a declaratory judgment action brought by Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Indemnity Company asking the district court to declare whether they had a duty to defend their insured, Victor Ginsburg, in Elaine A. Scarfo’s state court invasion of privacy action against him. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court issued an order granting summary judgment in favor of Allstate. The district court concluded that Scarfo’s allegations of unwelcome conduct did not state a cause of action for invasion of privacy under the relevant category of that tort…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Scarfo v. GinsbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Cason v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Ponton v. ScarfoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Agency for Health Care v. Assoc. Indus.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Boston Red SoxDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
  2. Smith v. Boston Red SoxDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API