Legal Opinion
City of Ishpeming v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1963No. Calendar 123, Docket 49,823PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
The Upper Peninsula Power Company (hereinafter referred to as the company) renders a similar service with a common facility' to an integrated area consisting of the counties of Alger, Baraga, Delta, Ploughton, Keweenaw, Mackinac, Marquette, Menominee, Ontonagon, and Schoolcraft.
The public service commission (hereinafter referred to as the commission), on March 18, 1960, requested that the company eliminate the 4 separate rate schedules being charged for similar service in the area and develop an area uniform rate.
The company complied with the commission’s request and filed an application with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- L. A. Darling Co. v. Water Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Giaras v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- J. E. Bejin Cartage Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Mt. Pleasant v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re Detroit Edison Co. ApplicationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Attorney General v. Public Service Commission 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Federal Armored Service, Inc v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.