Legal Opinion

Millennium Holdings LLC v. Glidden Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 2017No. 600920/08 ---13121 13120 13119 13118 13117PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals (27 NY3d 406 [May 5, 2016]), order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered November 26, 2013, which granted defendants the Glidden Company, now known as Akzo Nobel Paints LLC and Akzo Nobel Paints LLC’s (collectively ANP), motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, modified, on the law, to remand for a limited determination of whether the insurers are entitled to recover defense costs as against ANP on the basis of express subrogation, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Background

The Original Glidden and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Winkelmann v. Excelsior InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Federal Insurance v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Promuto v. Waste Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scekic v. SL Green Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Scekic v. SL Green Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Crown Wisteria, Inc. v. CibaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. Millennium Holdings LLC v. Glidden Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Millennium Holdings LLC v. Glidden Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API