Legal Opinion

National Carloading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 15, 1965No. C.D. 2529PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The collector of customs classified an importation, described on the invoices, as fruit knives, as “Household knives 0/4" ” in paragraph 355 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 355), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, supplemented by Presidential notification, 86 Treas. Dec. 337, T.D. 52820, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 4 cents each and 17% per centum ad valorem.

It is the claim of plaintiff that said merchandise should be classified in paragraph 355, as modified, supra, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Edge Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. Abraham & Straus v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Dohrmann Commercial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API