Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Commissioner of IRS

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 13, 2006No. 05-2517PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

This case invites us to consider whether 1998 revisions to the United States Tax Code eliminated the historical distinction between a “levy” and an “offset” and require the same procedural protections for both. The government traditionally has been thought to possess a common law right, as a creditor, to “offset,” or “set off,” funds owed to a taxpayer and thus held by the government — without prior notice — “to reduce the taxpayer’s outstanding tax liability,” United States ex rel. P.J. Keating Co. v. Warren Corp., 805 F.2d 449, 451-52 & n. 3 (1st Cir.1986); see…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Offiler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  3. Lunsford v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  4. Greene-Thapedi v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  5. United Sand and Gravel Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. University of Chicago v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Lisa Edwards v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  3. Pollock v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  4. Guralnik v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
  5. Cleveland v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API