Legal Opinion
Bujaki v. Egan
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 4, 1965No. Civ. No. A-64-64Published
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, Chief Judge.
The Complaint in this case is essentially one for damages for false impi-isonment, together with further allegations of violation of the plaintiff’s rights to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The State of Alaska was originally made a party to the Complaint but has been dismissed by virtue of the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Jurisdiction over the remaining defendants is vested in this court by reason of diversity of citizenship. (Sec. 1332, Title 28 U.S.C.A.) These remaining defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- R. W. Agnew v. Richard W. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Elizabeth Cawley v. Harland Warren, Wendall Thompson and Harold WenslandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.