Wilson v. Sauve
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheaeor
The defendant in error, Sauve, brought this suit in the district court against Arah L. Hungerford, and plaintiff in error was summoned as garnishee therein. Judgment in favor of Hungerford and against Wilson, the garnishee, for the benefit of Sauve. The garnishee brings the case here for review, and the defendant Sauve has assigned cross error.
The facts are as follows: On December 16, 1921, Charles N. Kinney was appointed receiver of the Thrift Mercantile Co., hereinafter designated as the Thrift Com pany, by order of the district court, in an action wherein the Wheeler & Hotter Mercantile…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henry v. Murphy & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Martin v. CopelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Chapman v. MearsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
- Wilson v. HobbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coin Service Investors, Inc. v. GroomsColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Field Family Construction Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961