Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Levin

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 29, 1937No. File No. 55060Published

1Opinion of the Court

The issues are found for the plaintiff on the second count, which alleges both assault and battery. This determination at the least, entitles plaintiff to nominal damages. Schmeltz vs. Tracey, 118 Conn. 492, 496. And to compensatory damages to the extent that special damages have been alleged and proved. Schmeltz vs. Tracey, supra, p. 496;Morache vs. Greenberg, 116 Conn. 549, 551.

The assault and battery are found to have been wanton, and hence, malicious, which requires that an allowance be made in the form of exemplary damages. Maisenbacker vs.Society Concardia, 71 Conn. 369, 378; Hanna vs.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maisenbacker v. Society ConcordiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Hanna v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  3. Lentine v. McAvoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Malley v. LaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Morache v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API