Logan v. Marshall
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
Petitioner, Thomas A. Logan, initiated this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for habeas corpus relief. This Court referred the instant action to the United States Magistrate for his report and recommended disposition thereof. The Magistrate filed same on August 27,1981, and recommended that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary under the criteria of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) and that petitioner’s application for habeas corpus should be denied.
Upon consideration of the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation and upon independent review of the trial transcript, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Mary Louise Bell v. Dorothy Arn, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Charles E. Oliphant v. Theodore Koehler, Warden, Marquette House of Corrections and Branch PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Riley I. Gillihan v. Felix Rodriguez, Warden, New Mexico State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LeslieOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re MichaelOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gina F. v. Frank BisignanoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Hindu American Foundation, Inc. v. KishDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Hindu American Foundation, Inc. v. KishDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.