Legal Opinion

McKinney v. San Antonio Independent School District

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1995No. 04-94-00486-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARDBERGER, Justice.

The question presented is whether a final judgment in a federal claim for race discrimination is res judicata of an action for enforcement of a state administrative order. We hold that it is not. Appellant, McKinney, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of the San Antonio Independent *881School District in his action seeking enforcement of an order by the Texas Commissioner of Education reinstating him as a teacher in the district. The trial court specifically stated that the summary judgment was based on res judicata due to the final judgment in the prior…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Piggly Wiggly Clarksville, Inc. v. Interstate Brands Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
  3. San Antonio Independent School District v. McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API