Legal Opinion

Wundenberg v. Markham

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal erom Clrouit Judge, Eirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

Appeal from a decree sustaining a demurrer and dismissing the hill on the ground that the complainant has a plain, speedy and adequate remedy at law. The hill avers that one J. H. Cummings has for several months last past heen in possession of certain premises described and that such occupation was without right or claim of right on Cummings’ part; that on November 21, 1901, complainant removed Cummings’ goods and chattels from the. premises and took exclusive possession of such premises; that thereafter, on the same day, respondent together with Cum*168mings, wlio…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Lacassagne v. ChapuisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. KaahanuiHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Yoshimasu v. VenhuizenHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Territory ex rel. Holloway v. HustaceHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Hemenway v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API