Legal Opinion

Dozsa v. Crum & Forster Insurance

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 7, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-1767PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEBEVOISE, District Judge.

I. The Proceedings.

Plaintiff, Nicolae Dozsa, husband of an employee of Crum and Forster, Inc., is covered by the Crum and Forster, Inc. Medical Plan (the “Plan” or the “Medical Plan”). Defendants are Crum and Forster and/or the Plan and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, which is a plan administrator.

Plaintiff has been diagnosed as suffering from a type of cancer known as multiple myeloma. He has undergone intensive chemotherapy treatment which has ceased to be effective. His physician Stephen Davis M.D., a specialist in oncology, referred him to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richard H. Heasley, Sr. And Doris G. Heasley v. Belden & Blake CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Pryzbowksi v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Adams v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  4. Wilson v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. White v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API