Legal Opinion

In re: Stan Bryan Vaughan and Tatiana Vaughan

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 29, 2016No. NV-15-1254-JuKiDUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED FEB 29 2016 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK 2 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5 In re: ) BAP No. NV-15-1254-JuKiD ) 6 STAN BRYAN VAUGHAN and ) Bk. No. 13-14399-GS TATIANA VAUGHAN, ) 7 ) Adv. No. 14-01128-GS Debtors. ) 8 ______________________________) ) 9 STAN BRYAN VAUGHAN; TATIANA ) VAUGHAN, ) 10 ) Appellants, ) 11 ) v. ) M E M O R A N D U M* 12 ) YVETTE WEINSTEIN, Chapter 7 ) 13 Trustee, ) ) 14 Appellee. ) ______________________________) 15 Submitted Without Oral Argument 16 on February 19,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API