Legal Opinion

McGinley v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 10, 1934No. Docket Nos. 49320, 59472Published

Held, under the facts in the record, there was one trust with five beneficiaries and not five separate trusts, and petitioner should return the entire net income for the five beneficiaries as a unit.

1Opinion of the Court

GERTRUDE MCGINLEY, TRUSTEE, WILLIAM MCGINLEY TRUST, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

McGinley v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 49320, 59472.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

31 B.T.A. 81; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1169;

August 10, 1934, Promulgated

Held, under the facts in the record, there was one trust with five beneficiaries and not five separate trusts, and petitioner should return the entire net income for the five beneficiaries as a unit.

Lawrence Tarlton, Esq., for the petitioner.

DeWitt M. Evans, Esq., for the respondent.

ADAMS

OPINION.

ADAMS: Deficiencies in income tax of $6,960…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGinley v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API