Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Rosenblitt v. Rosenblitt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1985Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Lazer, J. P.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part). The over-all issue, of course, is the right of a child custody litigant to have her retained psychiatrist examine the adverse parent. More specifically, we must decide whether Special Term abused its discretion in directing that plaintiff submit to a mental examination by the psychiatrist retained by the defendant. In view of the clear mandate of CPLR 3121 (a) and the uncontroverted allegations of both the defendant.and the psychiatrist that plaintiff is attempting to turn the children against defendant, I believe that this aspect of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Lincoln v. LincolnNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Lee v. County Ct. of Erie CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Gloria S. v. Richard B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Entwistle v. EntwistleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.