International Union v. Honeywell International Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY [63]
DAVID R. GRAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Thomas Bode, Brace Eaton, William Burns, Peter Antonellis and Larry Preston’s (“UAW”) motion to compel the discovery of certain attorney-client privileged communications of Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”). [63]. The motion was referred to this Court for hearing and disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). [81]. On May 21, 2014, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- In Re: Gregory LottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Napper v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Prudential Defense Solutions Inc. v. GrahamDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Timothy T. Boylan, J.R., Personally, and as the Administrator of the Estate of Lisa Lynn Edwards v. Brandon D. Wardlaw, et al.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026