Legal Opinion

United States v. McCoy

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 25, 2017No. 6:14-CR-06181 EAWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge

I. BACKGROUND

Defendants Earl McCoy (“McCoy”) and Matthew Nix (“Nix”) (collectively “Defendants”), represented by counsel, both stand accused by way of a 12-count Third *429Superseding Indictment, returned on January 5, 2017, as follows:

Count 1: Hobbs Act conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a);

Count 2: Use of firearms during and in relation to a crime of violence (the Hobbs Act conspiracy as set forth in Count 1), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) and 2;

Count 3: Attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API